Socioeconomic and gender factors play a significant and complex role in influencing household waste management practices, particularly concerning waste generation, attitudes toward segregation, and the division of labor within the home.
Socioeconomic Factors and Household Waste Management
Socioeconomic conditions affect both the quantity of waste generated and the household's approach to segregation and recycling.
1. Income, Urbanization, and Waste Generation
- Increased Waste Volume: Rapid urbanization, economic development, and changing consumption patterns lead to a significant increase in the quantity and complexity of municipal waste. Studies support a positive correlation between rising household income and per capita waste generation.
- Waste Composition: Socio-economic and psychological factors, such as family size, education level, and work status, influence the composition of household (HH) waste. For example, studies in Nepal suggest that organic waste typically makes up the largest proportion of municipal solid waste.
2. Influence of Remittance Income
Remittance, often an important source of family income, is associated with differences in attitude towards waste management:
- Lower Positive Attitudes toward Segregation: Households receiving remittances are less likely to have a positive attitude toward waste segregation compared to non-remittance households.
- This negative association may stem from the increased financial security making it possible for households to prioritize convenience over sustainable behavior. This economic stability can lead to behavioral complacency, decreasing the motivation to segregate waste appropriately.
- Remittance-receiving households may choose to replace labor-intensive activities like waste segregation with market-based strategies, such as paying for waste collection services.
- Practice Nuance: While remittance status significantly impacts attitude towards segregation, it was not found to be a strong predictor of overall waste minimization or recycling behaviors in some analyses, suggesting that financial status alone does not determine all waste handling behaviors.
3. Family Structure and Living Arrangements
Family structure and who the student lives with significantly influence knowledge and practice of household waste management:
- Joint Families and Knowledge: Students from joint families demonstrate significantly higher knowledge of waste segregation and overall waste management compared to those from nuclear families.
- Joint family settings support the intergenerational transfer of knowledge and routines, leading to a stronger, institutionalized sense of sustainable habits.
- Living with Parents and Practice: Students who live with their parents are significantly more likely to practice better overall waste management behaviors.
- The association between living with family and overall good waste management practices is strong, with individuals living with family being 3.834 times more likely to participate in waste management than those living independently (p=0.003). This is attributed to structured household routines and shared responsibilities.
4. Education (Parental)
In the context of one study focusing on secondary school students in Bhaktapur Municipality, the parental educational level was not found to significantly influence students' Knowledge, Attitude, or Practice (KAP) in household waste management. This suggests that factors like infrastructure accessibility and household environment may play a greater role than parental education alone in shaping youth waste management behavior.
5. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups (Informal Sector)
The poverty clusters involved in the informal waste sector (itinerant waste pickers/scavengers), often comprised of ethnic minorities, are considered stakeholders in solid waste management.
- Natural Recyclers: The poor generally do not generate as much waste as the rest of the population because they are natural recyclers and re-users.
- Time Allocation: While they may have less time for planning activities like composting, they have the time to perform these activities if livelihood can be derived from 3Rs efforts.
- Health Risk: These financially vulnerable groups are often exposed to hazardous materials without protective measures, underscoring significant public health risks associated with informal waste activities.
Gender Factors and Household Waste Management
Gender dynamics are crucial determinants of household waste management behavior, particularly influencing attitudes, knowledge, and adherence to specific practices like segregation.
1. Higher Female Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice
- Knowledge and Attitude: Female students demonstrate significantly higher knowledge regarding reuse, possess more positive attitudes, and show greater engagement in waste segregation practices than their male counterparts. Women generally exhibit a more positive attitude and behavior toward waste management than men.
- Segregation Practice: Female students tend to practice waste segregation more regularly than male students (p = .013). Women constitute a higher percentage of those who adopt waste segregation.
2. The Role of Gender in Household Responsibility
The observed gender differences are largely attributed to traditional gender roles:
- Primary Waste Manager: Women are more often designated as the individuals responsible for daily waste sorting and disposal within the household. The member of the household who usually manages waste is typically the daughter or daughter-in-law of the head of the household.
- Influence on Recycling Knowledge: Households where males are responsible for managing household waste show significantly lower recycling knowledge compared to those managed by females. This highlights that females playing a major role in waste management significantly influences household recycling knowledge.
- Workforce Roles: In municipal waste management settings, women are mostly sweepers while men typically use mechanized tools like handcarts.
3. Nuance in Gender Influence
While women show higher rates of knowledge and practice, gender alone is not always a strong independent predictor of sustainable waste management behavior. This suggests that when controlling for other socioeconomic or educational variables, the effect of gender can diminish, indicating that differences are often mediated by roles, responsibilities, and external factors rather than gender entirely in isolation.
Overall, interventions aimed at improving waste management must leverage existing female engagement while employing gender-sensitive strategies to involve men.
0 Comments