2. What is the main finding regarding remittances?
The main finding regarding remittances is that households
receiving remittance income were significantly less likely to have a positive
attitude toward waste segregation compared to non-remittance households.
This association is significant in shaping students' attitudes toward waste
management.
Key details underpinning this finding include:
- Behavioral
Complacency and Convenience: The additional financial resources
derived from remittances may enable these households to prioritize
convenience over sustainable waste behavior, as they might not feel
the direct financial pressure of waste accumulation and disposal. This
economic stability can lead to behavioral complacency, thereby
decreasing the household's motivation to segregate waste appropriately.
- Outsourcing
of Labor: This tendency aligns with the Household Production Theory,
where increased household income facilitates the outsourcing of
time-intensive tasks, such as labor-based activities like segregation
and composting, in favor of relying on municipal or private waste
facilities.
- Consumption
Shift: Remittance income generally shifts household priorities in
favor of consumption, housing, and education, often at the expense of
environmental involvement. Remittance households are also perceived as
having a lower sense of responsibility for managing waste at home,
assuming that external parties (municipality or private companies) will
handle the segregation for them.
- Attitude
vs. Practice Nuance: Although there is a significant negative
relationship between remittance receipt and the attitude toward
segregation, the study noted that no significant association was found
between remittance status and actual waste reduction behaviors.
0 Comments