The vibrant digital landscape that once empowered a generation in Nepal has, in a shocking turn of events, been plunged into darkness, leading to a profound "digital blackout" that exacts a fatal human cost and threatens the very foundations of our nation's tourism, business, and democratic future. As I reflect on the tragic events of September 8, 2025, it is clear that the government's heavy-handed decision to ban social media platforms has not only ignited widespread protests but has also exposed deep-seated frustrations with corruption and inequality, culminating in an unprecedented crisis.
A Draconian Measure: The Digital Blackout
On September 4, 2025, the Nepali government imposed a sweeping ban on 26 popular social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and Reddit. This decision, which took effect in the hours before dawn on Friday, instantly plunged millions of users into digital silence, disrupting communication, education, and commerce across the country. The Ministry of Communication and Information Technology justified the ban by citing the platforms' failure to register locally within a seven-day deadline, arguing it was a matter of national sovereignty, regulation, and a necessary measure to curb harmful content such as misinformation and hate speech.
Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli staunchly defended the crackdown, declaring that "The independence of the nation is greater than the loss of jobs of a handful of individuals," and asserting that firms making money in Nepal must comply with national law. Conversely, platforms like TikTok, Viber, WeTalk, Nimbuzz, and Poppo Live remained operational, reportedly due to their compliance with the new registration rules.
However, critics widely condemned the ban as premature and heavy-handed, perceiving it as a thinly veiled attempt to silence dissent, curb free speech, and suppress online exposures of elite privilege. Human rights groups raised alarm, noting that Nepal, once a regional "bright spot in digital openness," is now "edging into the ranks of countries that curtail online freedoms," potentially sliding towards authoritarian practices. This move, critics argued, created a "legal grey area" since the bill regulating social media had not yet been passed by parliament.
The Fatal Human Cost: Protests and Casualties
The social media blackout acted as an immediate catalyst, transforming virtual indignation into a tangible call for street-level mobilization. What followed was a historic youth-led uprising, dubbed a "Gen Z moment" or "Gen Z Revolution," driven by young Nepalis born between 1997 and 2012, or roughly the mid-1990s and early 2010s. Frustrated by government corruption, widening inequality, and the perceived misuse of political power, these digital natives took their outrage from TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube onto the streets of Kathmandu and other major cities.
The "Gen-Z Youths on the Streets!" movement deliberately eschewed traditional hierarchical leadership, operating on a decentralized model unified by a shared frustration with visible inequalities and a demand for governmental accountability. A key element igniting this outrage was the viral "NepoKids" campaign, which highlighted the lavish lifestyles of political elites' children through videos and photographs of foreign vacations, luxury brands, and conspicuous consumption. Posts like "Our taxes, their luxury... We pay, you flex" and "Nepo Kids show off their lifestyle on Instagram and TikTok, but never explain where the money comes from" resonated deeply, effectively translating abstract critiques of inequality into emotionally charged stories.
The protests, scheduled for September 8 at Maitighar Mandala in Kathmandu, and in other urban centers like Pokhara, Biratnagar, Inaruwa, Dharan, Jhapa, and Bharatpur, initially featured placards, slogans, and cultural performances, adhering to principles of peaceful resistance. However, the situation tragically escalated. While the movement peacefully began at Maitighar, it spiraled out of control when protesters marched toward Baneshwar, breaching restricted zones and vandalizing walls and gates of the Parliament House, even throwing stones and bottles.
The police, in response, used water cannons and tear gas, but as tensions escalated, they opened fire, resulting in a tragic loss of life. Reports indicate that between 14 and 19 people were killed, and over 100 to 300 were injured. Disturbingly, police even fired tear gas inside Civil Hospital, where patients were undergoing treatment. A curfew was subsequently imposed and expanded across Kathmandu and other cities to control the situation.
These casualties sparked widespread public outrage, with citizens demanding the resignation of Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, claiming the government had "committed murder". Human rights activist Mohna Ansari questioned the police's security strategy, suggesting alternative methods could have been used, and that firing tear gas and using water cannons provoked the protesters, especially since uniformed school students were present.
This "Gen Z moment" draws parallels with Nepal's "Enough Is Enough" movement in June 2020, which was also a leaderless, non-violent, youth-led initiative protesting government mishandling of the COVID-19 crisis, notably using social media for grassroots mobilization. The crucial difference, however, is the violent turn and the tragic loss of life in the current protests.
Devastating Impact on Nepal's Economy and Business
The digital blackout has cast a long shadow over Nepal's economy, particularly its burgeoning digital sector and crucial tourism industry. Experts are alarmed, noting that disrupting platforms that underpin commerce and communication risks "undermining investor confidence at a delicate moment". Nepal is slated to graduate from "least developed country" status in 2026, making foreign direct investment vital. Policy choices that appear "arbitrary or heavy-handed" may erode confidence, weaken the country’s sovereign credit rating, and make Nepal a less attractive destination for capital inflows.
The domestic technology sector faces acute risks, as many Nepali firms rely on social media tools for automation, outsourcing, digital marketing, and international client communication. The restrictions complicate these operations and create uncertainty for foreign partners, hindering Nepal's aspirations to grow its digital economy. Furthermore, a significant share of e-government services use third-party platforms for log-ins and identity verification, meaning the ban can disrupt public-service delivery and weaken citizen trust.
For everyday businesses and individuals, the impact has been immediate and severe. Small businesses in Kathmandu were among the first to feel the pinch. Dipa Gurung, a 28-year-old jewelry business owner, lamented that nearly all her trade occurred through Facebook and Instagram, and now she "can’t even reply to regular customers". Similarly, guesthouse managers in Pokhara, like Rita Rai, relied heavily on WhatsApp for guest communication, leading to instances where tourists couldn't find their accommodations. Recruitment firms sending workers abroad are also "back to emails and international calls" with LinkedIn and Zoom gone. Many content creators and digital marketers have seen their livelihoods directly hit by the shutdown of Facebook and YouTube, without any government-offered alternatives.
The tourism industry, a cornerstone of Nepal's economy, has been particularly vulnerable. Platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram are crucial for communicating with international clients, confirming trip bookings, and sharing travel updates. This disruption hits during Nepal's peak trekking season (September to November), a period when thousands of visitors arrive for popular treks like Everest Base Camp, Annapurna Base Camp, and Langtang. Guides, trekking agencies, and hotels rely on instant communication for arranging logistics, sending itinerary updates, coordinating staff in remote areas, and handling emergencies. Without access to these essential communication tools, Nepal’s tourism reputation suffers, as international travelers expect secure and reliable communication, forcing companies to resort to less familiar alternatives like Viber or email.
These specific economic blows are exacerbated by a broader national context of economic uncertainty and high youth unemployment. Nepal's youth unemployment rate stood at 20.36% in 2023, significantly higher than the national average of 12.6%. The country relies heavily on remittances, which account for 33% of its GDP, as slow job creation at home compels many young Nepalis to seek employment abroad. A staggering 82% of Nepal's workforce is in informal employment. The education system is often disconnected from labor market needs, leaving many graduates unprepared for available jobs. Rampant corruption, which increases the cost of living and reduces competitiveness, acts as a significant obstacle to economic growth, social development, and political stability.
Erosion of Democratic Principles and Freedom of Expression
Beyond the immediate economic and human toll, the digital blackout represents a severe threat to Nepal's democratic principles and the fundamental right to freedom of expression. Freedom of expression is widely recognized as a "foundational pillar of democracy," enabling public discourse, political participation, accountability, and the free exchange of ideas. Social media platforms have evolved into "the modern public square," where individuals exercise these basic democratic rights.
The government's ban is widely perceived as an attempt to suppress dissent and control the digital narrative, especially the critical "NepoKids" campaign. Prime Minister Oli's dismissal of the protests as mere attempts to "stir unrest" or "provoke society" under the guise of youth activism further highlights the government's stance. Such actions are particularly alarming given that Generation Z is "significantly more liberal and anti-authoritarian than earlier generations," often inclined to use civil disobedience to express strong moral views when politicians are silent.
Experts are deeply concerned that Nepal is "edging into the ranks of countries that curtail online freedoms" and "sliding towards the practices of authoritarian states that use connectivity restrictions as instruments of control". This repression is not an isolated incident but reflects a worrying regional trend of digital authoritarianism, characterized by surveillance, content removal, and legal intimidation.
The legal framework for the ban itself is precarious. The government enforced the ban without the "Operation, Use, and Regulation of Social Media in Nepal" bill being passed by parliament, creating a "legal grey area". Furthermore, Nepal's existing Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) and proposed Social Media Bill contain vague provisions that allow for arbitrary enforcement and the criminalization of online speech deemed "illegal," "offensive," or "contrary to public morality". This ambiguity risks creating a "chilling effect," where citizens "preemptively self-censor for fear of legal consequences". Such broad laws granting wide discretion to regulators undermine independent journalism, as seen in cases where critical news content was compelled to be removed. The result is a shrinking civic space and a decline in Nepal's scores in international e-governance and internet freedom rankings.
Corruption and Nepotism: The Deep-Seated Illness
At the heart of the youth's profound frustration lies Nepal's pervasive issue of corruption and nepotism. This is not merely an economic and legal problem but a "deeply rooted and substantial social issue" that affects political, court, and administrative sectors most profoundly. Corruption reduces competitiveness, increases the cost of living, and stands as a major obstacle to economic growth, social development, and political stability, while simultaneously eroding public trust in institutions.
The "NepoKids" campaign, which went viral, precisely targeted this entrenched corruption and widening inequality, exposing the lavish lifestyles of political families against the struggles of ordinary citizens. A survey revealed that 70% of respondents believe political leaders bear the primary responsibility for controlling corruption. This is particularly pertinent as "non-compliance with the existing rule of law" is identified as the leading cause of corruption by 40% of respondents, with political leaders and bureaucrats driven by "unexpected need" or "greed for money" being other significant factors. The political system itself is "more favorable for corruption," with expensive elections fueling the problem and politics becoming a "money-generating industry".
Nepotism and favoritism have a long and entrenched history in Nepali politics, persisting through various regimes, including the Rana rule, Panchayat, and monarchy, and continuing into the democratic era. This practice marginalizes deserving individuals, diminishes public trust, and hinders the effectiveness of public service. The current government's actions, therefore, are seen not as a solution but as a perpetuation of a system that serves elite interests at the expense of its citizens.
Conclusion: A Call for Rights-Respecting Governance
The events unfolding in Nepal represent a profound crisis with fatal human, economic, and democratic consequences. The government's "digital blackout" and subsequent violent suppression of youth protests are not merely unfortunate incidents but stark manifestations of a deeply flawed approach to governance. This blunt and destabilizing strategy not only stifles freedom of expression but also inflicts severe damage on critical sectors like tourism and business, which are vital for Nepal's development transition.
To navigate this crisis, Nepal must abandon its current path of repression and embrace a more nuanced, rights-respecting approach to social media regulation and governance as a whole. This requires transparency in governmental actions and platform policies, robust judicial oversight to ensure proportionality and accountability, and narrowly tailored laws that target specific unlawful conduct rather than imposing blanket bans. Furthermore, investing in digital literacy and promoting platform accountability are crucial for fostering a resilient citizenry and a healthy digital public sphere.
The youth of Nepal, particularly Generation Z, have demonstrated their agency and willingness to challenge entrenched power structures, demanding transparency, accountability, and systemic reform. Their protests, whether online or offline, represent a powerful call for change that cannot be silenced indefinitely. Nepal stands at a critical juncture. The choice is clear: either continue to suppress its citizens' voices, further imperiling its democratic future and economic prosperity, or heed the calls for genuine reform and build a society grounded in the values of pluralism, open debate, and respect for fundamental rights.
0 Comments