The air in New Baneshwor, usually a site of solemn reflection, today crackled with an unprecedented energy, echoing the frustrations of a generation that has found its voice, first on TikTok, and now, tragically, amidst the sting of tear gas and the roar of water cannons. What began as a digitally-fueled outpouring against political extravagance has, on this fateful September 8th, escalated into a profound street protest, challenging the very foundations of governance in Nepal. As I observe the unfolding events, it becomes clear that we are witnessing more than just a demonstration; this is a nascent revolution, sparked by Nepal’s Generation Z, who are boldly confronting both digital censorship and the deep-seated corruption of our elite.
The transition from viral posts to violent clashes underscores a critical turning point for our nation. On one side stands a government seemingly intent on controlling the digital narrative through sweeping social media bans. On the other, a generation of digital natives, born between roughly 1997 and 2012, who perceive this as a direct assault on their fundamental rights and an attempt to silence their collective outrage against systemic injustice.
The Digital Spark: Unpacking the Social Media Ban
The immediate catalyst for today’s unrest was the government’s decision on September 4 to impose a blanket ban on 26 social media platforms, including titans like Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and Reddit. This draconian measure was justified by Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s administration as a matter of "national dignity" and regulatory compliance, citing the failure of these foreign companies to register locally and adhere to national laws. Officials argued that the ban was necessary to curb harmful content, regulate advertising revenues, and enforce accountability.
However, this rationale rings hollow for many, particularly the youth. Critics, including human rights activists and a vast swathe of the Nepali public, view the ban as a transparent act of censorship designed to suppress dissent and control the digital narrative. For Gen Z, social media platforms are not merely for entertainment; they are vital public spheres, tools for civic engagement, and lifelines for communication, education, and livelihood.
The impact of this digital blackout has been immediate and severe. Businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, content creators, and those in the tourism sector, rely heavily on platforms like Facebook and Instagram for marketing, client communication, and bookings. Business owner have expressed their despair, stating, "Their livelihood lived in chats and comments. Now, they can’t even reply to regular customers”. Similarly, guesthouse managers have struggled to communicate with international guests. Nepal is currently in its peak trekking season, and the disruption to communication has significantly hampered the tourism industry, affecting travel agencies, guides, and hotels that depend on instant messaging for coordination.
The ban also cripples education. Students, particularly in technical fields, utilized platforms like YouTube and Reddit to supplement their often-outdated syllabi. A computer science student, laments, “We’re stuck with textbooks from another decade”. Beyond these practical implications, the ban fundamentally curtails freedom of expression and access to information, rights enshrined in our constitution and international human rights treaties. This raises alarm among experts who fear Nepal is sliding towards the practices of authoritarian states that use connectivity restrictions as instruments of control. The economic costs are substantial, with India, for instance, suffering an estimated USD 2.8 billion in losses in 2020 due to internet shutdowns. Nepal's reputation as a digitally open nation and its prospects for foreign investment are also at risk.
Interestingly, TikTok remains operational, having complied with government registration rules, showcasing a selective enforcement that further fuels public skepticism about the true motives behind the ban.
The Deep Roots: Elite Corruption and Widening Inequality
While the social media ban was the immediate spark, the underlying tinder for this generational uprising has been accumulating for years: deep-seated corruption, entrenched inequality, and the conspicuous wealth of political elites. The "NepoKids" phenomenon, a viral social media campaign, brought these frustrations to a boiling point. Young Nepalis took to platforms like TikTok and Reddit, juxtaposing images of the children of political leaders flaunting luxury cars, designer brands, and foreign vacations with the grim reality of ordinary citizens struggling with soaring inflation, high youth unemployment, and limited access to essential services.
The anger is palpable: “Our taxes, their luxury… We pay, you flex,” read one viral post. Another placard during the protests stated, “The leaders’ children return from abroad with Gucci bags, the people’s children in coffins,” alluding to young Nepalis forced to seek employment abroad, sometimes in war zones, due to severe poverty and a staggering 19.2% youth unemployment rate among those aged 15-29 (20.36% overall in 2023). The remittances sent by these migrant workers, constituting 33% of Nepal's GDP, highlight the nation's reliance on their sacrifice.
Corruption in Nepal is not merely an economic problem; it's a pervasive societal ill that erodes trust in public institutions and exacerbates inequality. Studies indicate that the political, court, and administration sectors are the most corruption-prone, with a striking 87% of respondents identifying them as such. The primary cause of corruption, according to 40% of respondents, is the non-compliance with existing laws, followed by unexpected needs (23%) and the greed for money (22%) among public sector employees and political leaders. Many political leaders, despite serving for short periods, have amassed significant wealth, raising questions about the sources of their luxury. A 2020 Transparency International report placed Nepal at 117th worldwide in the Corruption Perception Index, scoring only 33 out of 100.
Accusations of corruption and nepotism are not new. Past and present Prime Ministers, including KP Sharma Oli, Sher Bahadur Deuba, and Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda,' have faced allegations ranging from land scams to illegal commissions and misuse of funds. This deep-rooted issue, coupled with a political landscape marked by frequent power rotations and a large informal workforce (82% of Nepal's workforce), has left youth with little faith in traditional channels for economic and civic engagement.
Gen Z's Unique Approach: Digital Savvy Meets Street Power
This movement, dubbed "Gen Z Youths on the Streets!", is a testament to how technology has reshaped activism. Unlike previous generations who relied on traditional media or party structures, today's young people wield smartphones as tools of civic engagement, leveraging platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram as both a town square and a press office. This has enabled them to broadcast their voices directly to a global audience with unprecedented reach and immediacy.
What makes this uprising distinct is its horizontal, decentralized, and leaderless nature. Organizers intentionally eschewed traditional hierarchical leadership, fostering a non-partisan expression of public discontent. The movement thrives on networked communication, with viral content—especially videos contrasting "NepoKids'" extravagance with the struggles of ordinary Nepalis—turning abstract grievances into emotionally charged visual evidence. Memes, music, and short-form videos have become powerful tools for "civic pedagogy," educating a wider public on systemic disparities. This illustrates "connective action," where loosely affiliated participants mobilize around shared content rather than formal structures, democratizing participation and offering resilience against state suppression.
The movement has effectively blended digital coordination with physical mobilization. Viral campaigns on platforms like TikTok and Reddit sparked calls for demonstrations, quickly translating online outrage into real-world action. Protests were planned not only in Kathmandu's historic Maitighar Mandala, a symbolic epicenter for political demonstrations, but also in other urban centers like Pokhara, Biratnagar, and Dharan. These protests feature placards, slogans, and cultural performances, embodying a hybrid strategy of modern dissent.
Nepal has seen independent youth-led movements before. The "Enough Is Enough" movement in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, was also leaderless, non-violent, and non-partisan, relying on grassroots mobilization and social media to protest government mishandling of the crisis. This earlier movement, with its creative placards, yoga performances, and use of popular music as rallying chants, demonstrated a shift from aggressive, party-driven tactics to peaceful, culturally expressive resistance. Globally, parallels can be drawn to the Arab Spring, where digital platforms similarly enabled youth to coordinate, share information, and challenge entrenched power structures, showcasing the potential—and vulnerabilities—of horizontal, leaderless organizations. Today's Gen Z movement appears to be building on these precedents, asserting civic agency in a dynamic new form.
The Confrontation and its Aftermath: Tear Gas and Tragic Casualties
The peaceful beginning of today's protests at Maitighar Mandala quickly gave way to chaos as demonstrators, many in school uniforms, marched towards Baneshwar and the Parliament House. When protesters breached restricted zones, vandalized property, and threw stones and bottles, the situation escalated violently. Police responded with water cannons, tear gas, rubber bullets, and, eventually, live ammunition.
The toll has been devastating. As of this writing, reports indicate that between 14 to 19 people have been killed, and over 100 to 300 injured across Kathmandu and other cities like Itahari. This marks a tragic historical first, with such a high number of casualties in a single day of protest.
Human rights activists like Mohna Ansari have condemned the police's security strategy, questioning the use of excessive force and tactics like firing tear gas inside Civil Hospital where patients were undergoing treatment. They argue that authorities could have employed alternative methods and that the police's actions provoked the protesters, especially considering the presence of uniformed students. Political analysts like Jagat Nepal have echoed these concerns, calling for the immediate resignation of Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli on moral grounds.
Despite the mounting criticism and casualties, Prime Minister Oli has defiantly reframed the ban as a matter of national sovereignty, dismissing the "Gen Z" protests as attempts to stir unrest or as the actions of "puppets who only oppose for the sake of opposing". Curfews have been imposed and expanded across Kathmandu and other areas like Rupandehi and Itahari, with army personnel deployed to control the situation.
However, the movement has garnered significant support. Kathmandu Mayor Balen Shah, despite being too old (over 28) to participate in the rally, publicly expressed his backing, urging political actors not to hijack the youth's spontaneous movement. Celebrities like Madan Krishna Shrestha, Hari Bansha Acharya, and many artists and influencers have also voiced solidarity, amplifying the protesters' demands for transparency and accountability. The main opposition party, CPN (Maoist Centre), has also demanded PM Oli’s resignation, accusing the government of excessive force.
A Defining Moment: Revolution or Repression?
Today’s events represent a defining moment for Nepal, testing the delicate balance between government control and digital freedoms. The social media ban, intended to regulate, has instead inflamed deeply rooted grievances, highlighting the immense stakes for freedom of expression, privacy, and governance.
Internationally, experts are alarmed by Nepal’s trajectory, warning that the country, once a regional bright spot for digital openness, is now "edging into the ranks of countries that curtail online freedoms". This carries significant reputational and economic costs, risking investor confidence just as Nepal prepares to graduate from "least developed country" status in 2026. The disruption to commerce, education, and the crucial tourism sector, which relies on social media visibility, will undoubtedly undermine economic stability.
Yet, this repression has not quelled dissent. The rapid surge in searches for VPNs, proxy browsers, and foreign eSIMs immediately after the ban indicates a resilient populace determined to circumvent restrictions. History shows that attempts to stifle online activism can paradoxically mobilize citizens into alternative forms of resistance. This "Gen Z rebellion," as some have branded it, is not just about regaining access to apps; it's a profound challenge to an entrenched political class, demanding transparency and accountability in a nation where traditional channels have long fallen short.
Conclusion
The journey "From TikTok to Tear Gas" encapsulates the raw, unscripted drama of Nepal's present. This generational uprising, spearheaded by Gen Z, is a potent fusion of digital outrage against the lavish lives of "NepoKids" and profound frustration over a social media ban seen as outright censorship. Today's tragic casualties are a stark reminder of the high price paid when a government chooses suppression over dialogue, and dismisses genuine public grievances as mere "unrest".
The youth of Nepal have, with remarkable courage and creativity, laid bare the fault lines in our society. They have challenged the notion that power can exist without accountability, and that digital spaces can be arbitrarily controlled without consequence. Their leaderless, digitally-savvy, yet physically present activism represents a new template for dissent, one that cannot be easily contained by conventional means.
For Nepal to move forward, its leaders must recognize the legitimacy of these grievances. The tragic events of today demand a genuine shift towards transparent governance, accountability for corruption, and a steadfast commitment to digital rights and freedom of expression. Anything less risks alienating an entire generation and plunging the nation into further instability. The voice of Gen Z is not just a passing trend; it is the powerful, unyielding demand for a more just and equitable future. Ignoring it would be at our peril.
0 Comments