In September 2025, Nepal erupted in a series of unprecedented youth-led demonstrations, widely dubbed the "Gen Z protests". While the immediate catalyst was the government's controversial social media ban, a closer look reveals that this digital blackout merely ignited a much deeper, long-simmering frustration among Nepal's youth over systemic corruption, glaring inequality, and a pervasive lack of dignified opportunities. This uprising was a profound statement, a demand for dignity, and a forceful plea for an employment-first development model.
The Spark: A Digital Lifeline Severed
On September 4, 2025, the Government of Nepal initiated a sweeping ban on 26 social media platforms, including widely used services like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Reddit, Signal, and Snapchat. This move came after these platforms failed to register under new rules from the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, despite being given a seven-day deadline. Only a few platforms, such as TikTok, Viber, and WeTalk, had complied and remained operational.
The government justified the ban on grounds of national dignity, regulatory compliance, and sovereignty, stating that foreign companies must adhere to national laws. They also cited concerns about cybercrime, misinformation, and hate speech, claiming unregistered platforms were being used for malicious acts and disrupting social harmony. Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli dismissed the ensuing protests, reframing the ban as a nationalist struggle and accusing activists of being "puppets".
However, for millions of Nepalis, this ban was a direct assault on speech, work, and connectivity. Critics, including former Minister of Justice Gobinda Bandi and human rights organizations, denounced it as censorship and a violation of constitutional rights and international freedoms. Nepal, once a regional leader in digital openness, was now seen as curtailing online freedoms, raising concerns about its international image and commitment to open governance.
The Fuel: Nepal's Deep-Seated Youth Unemployment Crisis
While the social media ban was an undeniable "spark", the "fuel" that ignited the widespread protests was Nepal's broken political economy and a profound sense of disenfranchisement among its youth.
1. High Youth Unemployment and Economic Hardship: Nepal faces a persistent and significant youth unemployment challenge. In 2023, the youth unemployment rate for those aged 15-24 was estimated at 20.36%, considerably higher than the national average of 12.6%. Earlier data from 2017/18 placed the youth unemployment rate (15-24 years) at 21.4%. For the age group 15-29, the unemployment rate was around 19.2%. This problem is not unique; both developed and developing countries grapple with youth unemployment.
The causes are multifaceted:
- Educational Mismatch: There is a stark disconnect between the skills imparted by Nepal's education system and the demands of the labor market. Outdated curricula and inadequate vocational training leave many graduates unprepared for available jobs, leading to underemployment and joblessness.
- Limited Job Creation: Key economic sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and services have not expanded sufficiently to absorb the growing number of young job seekers. This stagnant growth, coupled with insufficient investment in industries, hinders the diversification of job opportunities.
- Societal Biases: A strong societal preference for "white-collar" jobs discourages young people from pursuing vocational trades, even when those fields offer more opportunities.
- Ineffective Policies and Lack of Support for Startups: Despite various government plans and policies aimed at youth employment, implementation often falls short. There's a lack of institutional support for young entrepreneurs, limiting their ability to create businesses and jobs.
2. Forced Migration and Reliance on Remittances: The lack of dignified jobs and opportunities at home compels thousands of young Nepalis to seek work abroad. In FY 2024/25 alone, the Department of Foreign Employment issued 839,266 exit labor permits, representing a staggering out-migration for a country of approximately 30 million people. These are not tourists; they are the very cohort now on the streets.
Remittances, the money sent home by these migrant workers, form a significant portion of Nepal's economy, hovering around 33% of GDP in 2024. While these remittances are crucial for keeping households afloat and paying import bills, they mask a lack of structural transformation in the domestic economy. This model "exports its youth to low-wage contracts while importing basics, and that depends on patronage rather than productivity". Nearly two million Nepalese living abroad relied on platforms like WhatsApp and Messenger to communicate with families and send remittances. The ban severed this vital lifeline, making communication challenging and frustrating.
3. The "Nepo Kid" Phenomenon: Exposing Elite Privilege: Further fueling the discontent was the viral "Nepo Kid" campaign, which gained immense traction on social media platforms like TikTok and Reddit prior to the ban. Inspired by global discussions on nepotism, young Nepalis used these platforms to expose the lavish lifestyles of political elites' children – "luxury cars, foreign degrees, Instagrammed holidays" – in stark contrast to the economic struggles of ordinary citizens. Viral videos showcased "elite kids flaunting designer clothes and foreign stays with the struggles of ordinary Nepalis, many of whom migrate for work". Slogans like "Our taxes, their luxury... We pay, you flex" captured this widespread anger. This trend highlighted entrenched corruption and widening inequality, with many youths suspecting the social media ban was a deliberate attempt to silence these online exposures, a "cover-up dressed in nationalist rhetoric". Sociologists described this as a "creative and powerful way to show inequality" and a "potent 'bugle call against the ruling system'".
A Broken Development Model and the Call for Dignity
The confluence of the social media ban, deep-seated corruption, high youth unemployment, and the stark visibility of elite privilege through the "Nepo Kid" trend created an explosive atmosphere. The protests were not just about "apps" but represented a generation's collision with an economy and political order that repeatedly shut doors of opportunity.
The "Gen Z protests" were largely leaderless and non-partisan, operating on a horizontal, decentralized model, using networked communication to mobilize. Tens of thousands participated in Kathmandu and other major cities, demanding not only the restoration of social media but also action against corruption, governmental accountability, and transparency, with some even calling for the overthrow of the government.
The demonstrations quickly escalated from Maitighar Mandala to the federal parliament building, with security forces responding with tear gas, water cannons, rubber bullets, and live ammunition. This heavy-handed crackdown resulted in significant casualties, with at least 19 people killed and over 300 injured. The government eventually lifted the social media ban and Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli resigned.
For Gen Z Nepalis, these protests were about more than just internet access; they were about asserting their dignity in a system that "exports its youth to low-wage contracts while importing basics". It was a collective "plebiscite" against a development model that had failed to provide meaningful opportunities at home, leading to a constant outflow of its most energetic population. The streets became the "one place where dignity can be asserted". The movement called for an employment-first development model that prioritizes creating stable, value-adding work for its educated youth domestically.
The Lingering Questions for Nepal's Future
Even with the social media ban lifted and the Prime Minister's resignation, the core issues persist. The protests have laid bare years of frustration with corruption, political instability, and a profound loss of trust in the ruling class. The challenge for Nepal's leaders is no longer simply to restore order, but to rebuild legitimacy with a generation that has unequivocally demonstrated its willingness to challenge the status quo. This necessitates not just legal reforms, but a fundamental shift towards policies that foster domestic job creation, improve the education system to meet market demands, and genuinely address the systemic corruption and inequality that continue to push Nepal's youth towards an uncertain future, both at home and abroad.
0 Comments