What behavioral and systemic changes are needed to improve waste segregation in Kathmandu?

To improve waste segregation and management in Kathmandu Valley, both behavioral and systemic changes are crucial, with a strong emphasis on addressing the lack of consistent practice at the source.

Based on the source, the following changes are needed:

1. Behavioral Changes:

  • Overcome the "Lack of Practice" and "Ignorance": The author explicitly states that the problem lies in a "practice that lacks" and "ignorance that leads to this situation". This suggests a need for sustained efforts that not only raise awareness (which the source suggests is already present) but genuinely translate awareness into consistent action at the household and office level.
  • Shift from a "Blaming Others" Mentality: A significant obstacle is the "blaming to other mentality or saying that system does not work mentality". For effective waste segregation, individuals and communities need to take personal responsibility for their waste management practices at the source rather than attributing failures solely to external systems.
  • Consistent Source Segregation by Households and Offices: Despite repeated advice from municipality workers and their desire to collect segregated waste, waste continues to be collected mixed in plastic bags from homes and offices. Therefore, a fundamental behavioral change required is the diligent and consistent segregation of waste at the source by all community members. This includes separating organic, recyclable, hazardous, and sanitary waste from each other.
  • Active Community Compliance: Even with municipalities publishing notices and supporting segregated collection systems, the community has not acted on it, and waste remains unsegregated. This highlights the need for active compliance and participation from the public in following established guidelines for waste segregation.

2. Systemic Changes (Primarily focused on ensuring compliance with existing frameworks):

  • Ensure Enforcement and Utilization of Existing Segregated Collection Systems: The municipalities have already "tried their best to make aware the people and have also supported for segregated collection system". The systemic change here is not necessarily to create new systems, but to ensure that these established systems are effectively utilized by the community and that there is compliance with the segregated collection.
  • Reinforce Source Segregation as the Foundational Step: Previous projects aimed at proper waste management failed because they all "required proper waste segregation at source and that was not done or happened". Any future systemic interventions or management strategies must prioritize and ensure that source segregation is genuinely implemented as the very first and most crucial step in the waste management chain.
  • Address Contamination Issues at the Point of Collection: The current practice leads to recyclables being highly contaminated with organic, hazardous, and sanitary waste. Systemic measures could explore mechanisms or incentives that discourage the mixing of waste at the collection point, or disincentives for non-segregated waste. The current situation at transfer stations makes the "recovery of the recyclable items and segregation of other types of waste quite impossible". Therefore, the systemic change needed is to prevent this high level of contamination from occurring in the first place by ensuring waste is segregated before it reaches the collection vehicles or transfer stations.

In summary, while various stakeholders are working on awareness and collection systems, the core systemic and behavioral challenge is the failure of individuals to perform proper waste segregation at the source, despite being aware and having access to supportive municipal frameworks. Addressing this fundamental lack of practice and the prevalent "blaming others" mentality is key to improving waste segregation and management in Kathmandu Valley.

0 Comments